People were divided into groups of supporters and opponents of such practice. Both have strong and persuasive arguments.
July 4th, The current debate about gay Christianity traces back to a centuries-old dispute between Protestants and Catholics about the doctrine of man and the doctrine of sin. Roman Catholics do not regard involuntary desire for sin concupiscence to be sinful. We—like others who have opposed this movement—have been accused of misrepresenting his views.
To the contrary, we believe that we have an honest theological difference, one that shows that different theological commitments will necessarily produce different theological applications. In this essay we underline something that has gotten lost in recent discussions: Our theological foundations are vastly different.
Thus, our understanding of human sexuality, sin, personhood, and the suffering that results from original sin is vastly different as well.
This is nowhere clearer than in our different understandings of concupiscence. Our differences here ultimately boil down to a different understanding of scripture.
Augustine understands this desire to be the key pre-behavioral component of our sin. Such desire consists of the fallen inclinations that we all continually experience before ever actually choosing to sin.
In a sermon on Romans 7, Augustine describes it this way: The key point here is that Augustine identifies the desire to sin as sin. Likewise, in a sermon that Augustine preached in A.
Although Augustine sometimes refrained from calling concupiscence sin, his mature reflection on Scripture reveals that he did, indeed, label it as such.
The Roman Catholic tradition, however, departs from Augustine on this point and reflects the view that concupiscence is not itself sinand that only conscious acts of the will can truly be deemed to be sinful.
The Reformed tradition differs sharply from Roman Catholicism on this point and reflects the Augustinian view that both evil desire and evil deeds must be regarded as thoroughly sinful. By no means Psalm 5: Cursed is every one that continues not in all things which are written in the book of the law, to do them Deut.
It matters not whether the desire for evil is involuntary or voluntary. Perhaps the classic expression of this comes from John Calvin, who also acknowledges his explicit appropriation of Augustine on the point in 3. We hold that there is always sin in the saints, until they are freed from their mortal frame, because depraved concupiscence resides in their flesh, and is at variance with rectitude.
This in regard to the saints loses its dominion in this world, and is destroyed in heaven. The proper understanding of Augustine is still a point of contention between Protestants and Catholics.
We do not wish to resolve that debate here. The theological roots of our differences with Belgau run deep. We Reformed Protestants believe that original sin, actual sin, and indwelling sin all condemn us.
We do not believe that baptism removes original sin. Nor do we believe that redemption in Christ makes all effects of our sinful nature disappear.
The gay Christian movement limits the extent of the fall.
The dangers of this error must not be underestimated. If his intellect is not darkened, then he can find salvation by the use of reason and improve himself through education. Let us ask God to show us ever more profoundly the tragic results of our fall, that we might understand ever more profoundly the amazing wonders of the gospel.
Our division is the difference between a Reformed Protestant anthropology and a Roman Catholic one, and we remain convinced that the former is the one most faithful to scripture. Scripture The current debate about gay Christianity traces back to a centuries-old dispute between Protestants and Catholics about the doctrine of man and the doctrine of sin.
Roman Catholics do not regard involuntary desire for sin i. This stark difference explains why Belgau has denied that same-sex attraction is sinful. For exampleBelgau has written: The desire to have sex with others of our own sex is a temptation to sin which is a result of the fall, but it is not, in itself, sinful.
I believe that gay sex is sinful, and that the desire for gay sex, though not itself sinful, is a temptation… When Belgau argues that same-sex desire is not sinful, he is being a good Roman Catholic.
But he is also articulating a viewpoint that is at odds with the Reformed tradition and, more importantly, with scripture. The Bible teaches that our desires—all of them, voluntary or involuntary—are morally implicated. Desire is teleological, and its moral character is determined by its object.
If someone desires a good thing, then the desire itself is good e.How to Write this Essay Writing Tips. More Gay Marriage Essay Example Outline Back to all templates. Share.
Download. Section 1. Enter tip for section. Introduction. Section 1: Introduction. Tip: This section should include your thesis sentence and will determine if you are for or against gay marriage.
This argumentative essay on gay marriage will explore both sides on the debate of gay and lesbian marriages. Historically, marriage was seen as a religious and civil union that brought together a man and woman for the purpose of joining family and to live the rest of their lives together.
A gay marriage essay should cover both the legal and moral aspects of a marriage between two people of the same sex. It is a very controversial subject and can be interesting to research and write. Gay Marriage: Why It Is Good for Gays, Good for Straights, and Good for America [Jonathan Rauch] on rutadeltambor.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.
Thoughtful and convincingly argued Rauch's impressive book is as enthusiastic an encomium to marriage as anyone. I think Jen Hatmaker probably represents the feelings of a lot of folks who are worn out by the culture wars.
In a recent post, she urges Christians to sit out the public debate on gay marriage. Her argument is simply that we have better things to do and that we are alienating gay people from Christianity by participating. s August: Shipment of the August issue of ONE magazine, with the cover story "Homosexual Marriage?", is delayed by U.S Post Office officials for three weeks while they try to determine whether its contents are obscene.; January 13, In One, Inc.
v. Olesen, the United States Supreme Court rules that homosexual writings .